Hill style shooting form and bow design

     This post is a shallow dive into the nuances of a Hill style / ASL and how a properly made bow will shoot in a forgiving manner using the proper shooting form as promoted by Howard Hill and John Schulz.

     One of the most obvious things one notices when picking up a Hill style longbow is the physically light mass weight.  It's almost wand-like when properly constructed and balanced.  The very essence of this style of bow lends itself to being shot with a fluid Hill style form.  Hearkening back to the earlier blogs saying how one should shoot a Hill style for some time before beginning to tune arrows, this is one of the reasons why and how it pertains to the construction of the bow.  

     The Hill style longbow has a straight or at most, slightly dished grip that will seat itself into the palm of the hand along the base of the thumb.  The thumb joint as Hill described, not the thumb knuckle as has been taught by certain instructors.   This is a couple of photos of a Hill style longbow seated deeply into the hand...notice the thumb rides alongside the handle, and there is a lot of meat of the base of the t thumb as the grip seats deeply into the palm.





    When the bow is seated this deeply into the hand, it can basically be shot with open fingers as the fingers are not needed to keep the bow in place.  However, squeezing a little tighter with the bottom two fingers will keep the bow seated in the hand firmly and puts the pressure against the bones in the arm, and this pressure keeps the bow's lower limb from traveling back towards the shooter as the bow is drawn.  This helps keep the lower limb in proper dynamic tiller.  This seemingly small detail on the grip helps keep a bow's timing correct and that affects the feel of the bow, bow noise and arrow flight.

    If the bow is not squeezed to death because it is seated deeply into the hand, then another overlooked aspect of bow design can come into play.  The light weight, non-centershot handle.

    If a longbow is shown in high speed - slow motion video during the shot, and the arrow can be seen, one will notice that the arrow is flexed into the bow by the pressure of the string moving forward.  Because the Hill style bow is not centershot, the arrow is "thrown" into the bow on an angle.  As the arrow rebounds and flexes away from the bow it begins what is known as "archer's paradox"s which continues and gradually diminishes as the arrow flexes and oscillates downrange.  If an arrow is too stiff, as it is pushed into the bow, it doesn't bend as much and it will clank against the side of the bow and kick to the side and veer to the left (RH shooter).  If the arrow is weak, it will flex too much against the bow and rebound too much and the excess flexing causes the arrow to over bend to the right (RH shooter) as it goes around the bow. This is fairly common knowledge among archers.  However....

    If the bow isn't held stiffly, and the bow arm is flexed and bent, and the wrist is bent downward (due to the straight handle) then the bow can be allowed to move just a bit.  When a stiff arrow is thrown into the bow on the slight angle caused by a non centershot handle, the pressure of the arrow pushing into the bow will cause the bow to be pushed slightly to the side. Not talking about a great amount, but somewhere around 1/16" to 1/8" off line to the side opposite of the shelf.  This will not happen to any measureable extent if the bow is held rigidly in a stiff-arm target shooting form, or even in a shooting machine.   However, there is quite a bit of bow movement that can be measured by a stiff arrow pushing against a softly held bow.  Dan Quillian tested this theory back in the 80's.  He wrote an indepth article series on his findings in the old Western Bowhunter magazine column he authored.  Dan attached a type of seismagraph instrument to his bow and traced the bow movement during the shot, both stiff arm rigid hold and soft arm, soft relaxed hold.  It was eye opening to see how much a bow moved during the shot, being pushed to the side when a proper Hill style shooting form was employed.  Subsequent tests over the years by other archers have shown that a Hill style longbow shot from a shooting maching needs softer spined arrows than one shot by a fluid Hill style shooter.

    So what does this mean?  Well, if you have a light weight, non centershot Hill style longbow and you shoot with a fluid, relaxed, bent bow arm, bent low wrist bow hand, you can shoot stiffer arrows than the guy that shoots with a straight arm, target style form in a heavier handled ASL.  This is proven all the time by serious Hill style devotees versus the modern fad target shooting style being employed by various longbow shooters/teachers.  The stiffer arrow would seem to shoot more to the left (RH shooter)...true, unless it is also pushing the bow to the right.   These two forces will negate each other to some extent and the arrow doesn't need to bend as much around the bow as it would seem.  If the bow arm is held stiff and rigid and straight, the bow isn't allowed to move to the right (RH shooter) so the arrow needs to be weaker to bend around the bow.  Simple huh? 

    This is proven time and again by archers who first pick up a Hill style longbow and immediately go try to tune arrows...they need weak arrows to get good flight...many times the arrow spine is weaker than the bow weight by 5 or more pounds.  If they continue to shoot their bow and get used to it and learn to shoot more fluid in the Hill style, they will learn that they need stiffer arrows out of the same bow...why? because their shooting form is getting more Hill like and the bow is allowed to move in the hand and it is allowed to be forced to the side by the pressure of the arrow.  Most shooters proficient in using the Hill style of shooting can shoot arrows 5 - 10# over the weight of the bow.

    I read once of one of the old time longbow shooters from the 1940s bemoaning the issue of the "current" trend of archers obsessing about tuning their arrows to great extent to their all wood longbows...instead of doing like the old guys of getting a stiff arrow and learning to shoot it.  I guess this was his way of tuning his equipment.  Let the stiff arrow push the bow out of the way, and the arrow will go where it is aimed.

   This is a pretty intense post, give it some thought if you've never done so to this kind of information.  It is something that staunch long-time Hill style / ASL shooters have known and accepted that works, without maybe really knowing why...and information that the new wave of archers forcing their target shooting methods on the Hill style / ASL  have yet to realize.  But it's all part of the Hill style.  Until next time,

Shoot straight.

     

Comments

  1. thanks for the explanation- something I long pondered-did not know about Dan Quillins study

    I kinga figured the bow was self adjusting due to the force/stiffness of the arrow-being able to get a respectible group from spines of 1916 to 2117 -even though a 2016 was the best for the bow (all same lenght and point weight) (I have them made up as test arrows for when I get a new bow)

    thanks for the great explanation

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ok, guess I am one of the "it just works" crowd. I have always bought arrows spined the same as the draw weight of my lighter bows and put 3 ~ 5 1/2" feathers on them and they always shoot just fine.
    I have never heard this explanation before but it makes sense, now I know "the rest of the story"
    Thank you Nate
    Art Graham

    ReplyDelete
  3. Had my frustrations early on in thinking why do I need the lightest spine possible when reading the old 'Traditional Longbow Digest' series, it seemed they always shot stiffer spined arrows. It was frustrating and I 'quit' quite often in my quest to shoot ASL bows.
    It was many years until I started taking things serious and listening to 'archers in the know' that I finally realized what was happening. Thanks again Nate for the reassurance that I'm finally on the 'right page'.
    Shick

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've never gotten this far off in the weeds about the why's of spine with a Hill Style bow. One of the primary reasons I love the ASL compared to center-shot or beyond center-shot bows is the fact that I can take the bows draw weight at my draw length and apply the old 5+ or 5- for this, that, and the other thing method and be good-to-go. Several years ago I messed with an ILF riser or two that were both cut past-center and with this method of shooting could never achieve the same results. Simplicity always wins in my book. Thanks Nate for a thorough explanation!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks Nate for sharing so much information and carrying on the tradition. You are saving a lot of frustration and time wasted in trial and error. Really enjoying your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This post wasn't meant to get too far in the weeds, and I realize that there are a lot of diehard longbow shooters who shoot in the fluid Hill style and are enjoying much success in the field with that technique. However, there are a lot of newcomers to the Hill style/ASL that only know one way to shoot a bow... that being a heavily target archery influenced shooting method. What I mean by that is it's a carryover from their compound shooting methods... Straight arm, offset grip, long draw, rotational bone on bone draw, three under and other things.
    These shooters don't know about the fluid casual Hill style of shooting and I'm attempting to show the other side, the side that Hill developed and taught.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry Nate....the "off in the weeds" comment was meant only that I'm a simple dolt when it comes to everything, especially tuning. I definitely have an interest in the physics behind it and appreciate the sharing of knowledge.

      Delete
  7. Nate this is a great blog. You mentioned the straight arm with a long draw. I have noticed a measure of people that order a ASL and have it built @ 28" plus. When I shot with Dave Miller my draw length shortened by a good 2 ". That was 7 years ago. Since then and with shooting with Jim Belcher it shortened another inch. The low shoulder and bent elbow make a huge difference. Dave Miller told me that John Schulz told him that Howard Hill was a very strong big man with large hands and long arms and his draw length was under 28".

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wow, a lot to take on this one Nate. I was experimenting with exerting a little more pressure on the bow with the lower two finger last time I was out shooting. I'm going to continue with that next time I get out and be sure to keep all this in mind.
    Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  9. i do enjoy reading what you have to say, there are so many things to learn I would like you to go into more detail about pressure on the 2 bottom fingers.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hello this is longbow again. I use the split finger method of drawing the bow and anchor the middle finger to just on the corner of my mouth. I use a stiff fingered glove(a Hill glove with inserts) to get a nice snappy release, by kind of snapping my lower ring finger off the string. Sounds kind of weird I guess but I seem to be very consistent using this method when stumping or when I hunted.

    I discovered the trick to using a stiff Hill glove is to get one size smaller than you you need and then get it wet in warm water and putting it on and wearing it till it dries on your fingers, it wet forms to the shape and size of your fingers. I found that say if you need an xtra large type glove like I wear normally for riding on my scoot eventually that size glove if in a stiff Hill style shooting glove would start to slide off my fingers when shooting after a bit and get a bit out of shape and I would have to use rosin on my fingers to keep it somewhat stable on my fingers. The one size smaller and wearing till it dries worked great. stay safe and keepem sharp

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

POPULAR TOPICS